Why all objects are truthy in JavaScript

By -
In JavaScript, all objects are truthy [1], even new Boolean(false), empty arrays and empty objects:

    > Boolean(new Boolean(false))
    true
    > Boolean([])
    true
    > Boolean({})
    true


That is different from how objects are converted to number and string, where you can control the result by implementing the methods valueOf() and toString() [2].



Why converting to boolean is different



The conversion to boolean is different for historic reasons: For ECMAScript 1, it was decided to not allow objects to configure that conversion.
The rationale was as follows. The boolean operators || and && preserve the values of their operands. Therefore, one may have to coerce the same object several times. That was considered a performance problem and led to the rejection.


As an example, let’s assume that new Boolean(false) coerces to false and use it in an expression:


    new Boolean(false) && 1 && true


That expression is evaluated in two steps:

    new Boolean(false) && 1    → new Boolean(false)
    new Boolean(false) && true → new Boolean(false)


For each step, you need to coerce new Boolean(false) to boolean in order to determine the result.

The exception to the rule



Some browsers have the (deprecated) property document.all that is quite weird. For example, the following is an interaction in Google Chrome’s console:

    > {}.toString.call(document.all)  // an object
    '[object HTMLAllCollection]'
    > Boolean(document.all)  // falsy!
    false
    > typeof document.all  // strange!
    'undefined'


References




  1. JavaScript quirk 1: implicit conversion of values

  2. What is {} + {} in JavaScript?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Steve Lopez and the Importance of Newspapers

By -
Image
It has been one year since I cancelled my subscriptions to The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times . In that time, I continued to read both publications online. My assessment of this experiment is that reading newspapers and journalism online is vastly inferior to the hard copy thrown on my porch each morning. So I restarted my subscription to the Los Angeles Times and I have made it a point to buy The New York Times as often as I pass one of those coin boxes or my local news stand. The catalyst for this re-evaluation resulted from catching the film, The Soloist on cable last week. I liked the movie, although the scenes I found most interesting were the ones that showed columnist Steve Lopez at work. I realized the book was sitting in my “to-read” stack, so I pulled it and began reading. The book, as I expected, is better than the film. Lopez clearly addresses the revolution occurring in journalism, and worries about his future with the paper even as he researches and writes...
Keep reading

Ideas for fixing unconnected computing

By -
I traveled quite a bit recently and got exposed to a negative aspect of current technology: Things work well if you have a solid internet connection with no traffic limits and are plugged into a power outlet. Otherwise, things do not work well at all. This blog post describes the problems that arise and suggests solutions. Managing data traffic Cell phones are quite good at conserving traffic, laptops much less so. This becomes a problem when your laptop has a mobile connection (e.g., via tethering or in a hotel with data caps). I once accidentally started iTunes in such a situation and immediately used up my daily allowance of traffic. Similarly, mobile email is frugal with traffic (only the current folder is updated, attachments are only downloaded on demand, etc.), desktop email is usually not. How can this be handled better? I’d like to see three traffic modes for all operating systems: “full”, “restricted”, “minimal”: In full traffic mode , all data transfers are allowed and happe...
Keep reading

Omar to kill me

By -
Image
  The sentence “ Omar m’a tuer ” is unintelligible French, as if it had been written by an illiterate person. At first sight, Mme Ghislaine Marchal —the author of those words in blood—seems to be saying that she had been killed by Omar in her villa at Mougins (Alpes-Maritimes). But why would that dying French lady have used such poor grammar? On that flimsy evidence, in 1991, the Moroccan gardener Omar Raddad was condemned and jailed. But he persisted non-stop upon his innocence. In 1998, he was liberated, and now lives in Morocco. A recent analysis of DNA specimens from the scene of the crime provides new facts. Four males, none of whom was Omar Raddad, have left traces of their presence. Will the real murderer be identified at last?
Keep reading