Searching websites and evaluating JavaScript via Chrome’s omnibox

By -
This blog post explains how to search several websites (not just a single search engine!) from the omnibox (address bar) in Google Chrome.


Managing search engines



The default is simple: If you enter something in the omnibox and hit return, Chrome uses your input as a search query for Google. Via “Settings → Search”, you have the option of choosing a different search engine for this operation (my Chrome has the defaults Google, Yahoo, Bing).


Next to the drop-down list with the defaults, there is the button “Manage search engines...”, which is where things get interesting. First there is a list with “default search engines” (the ones in the drop-down list), then there is a list with “other search engines”. You can add new search engines to the latter and then move them to the former by clicking the “Make default” button that appears when you hover over an appropriate item.


A search engine entry has three fields: A name, a keyword and a URL. The keyword is an abbreviation for the URL, the URL can contain the placeholder string “%s” where Chrome fills in what you have typed in order to perform a query. Lets try this out and add the following search engine to “other search engines”:


  • Name: Vimeo

  • Keyword: vi

  • URL: http://vimeo.com/search?q=%s


Now we can trigger a search on Vimeo, by typing the keyword “vi”:





Then Chrome tells us to hit Tab, after which we can enter a query:





Chrome also recognizes when you are typing the beginning of a keyword, so you can choose a longer one, if you want to (caveat: not always reliable when several keywords start with the same characters). Google’s documentation says that normal URLs work, too, but that wasn’t the case for my Chrome.


Note that Firefox has had this feature for a long time [1]. You can turn any bookmark into a search engine by assigning it a keyword. This has the added advantage that you can organize your keyword bookmarks in folders.

Automatically adding a web site to Chrome’s search engines



If you associate the right meta-data with your web site, Chrome automatically adds an entry to its “other search engines” when someone visits it. The meta-data has to conform to the OpenSearch standard. You associate it by putting the following tag into the <head> section of a web page.

    <link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml"
                       href="data/opensearch.xml">

The file data/opensearch.xml contains the actual OpenSearch meta-data, for example:

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <OpenSearchDescription xmlns="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/">
        <ShortName>Exemplary</ShortName>
        <Description>Use Example.com to search the Web.</Description>
        <Url type="application/rss+xml" 
             template="http://example.com/?q={searchTerms}"/>
        <Url type="application/x-suggestions+json"
             template="http://example.com/suggestions?q={searchTerms}"/>
    </OpenSearchDescription>


The first Url tag tells Chrome how to search, the second one tells it how to retrieve suggestions. As far as I can tell, Chrome automatically assigns the domain name of the URL as a keyword.


You can go to vimeo.com to see a real-world example. After you have visited that web site, there is an entry for it in your “other search engines”.

Evaluate JavaScript via a keyword



Keywords become even more powerful if you combine them with JavaScript and bookmarklets [2]. For example, you can add the following “search engine”:

  • Name: Evaluate

  • Keyword: eval

  • URL: javascript:alert(%s)


Now there is less to type if you want to evaluate a JavaScript expression:

    eval [tab] 3 * 7        → 21
    eval [tab] 'abc'.length → 3


References




  1. Browser keywords: using the address bar as a command line

  2. Tip: use JavaScript as a calculator in Firefox and Chrome


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Steve Lopez and the Importance of Newspapers

By -
Image
It has been one year since I cancelled my subscriptions to The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times . In that time, I continued to read both publications online. My assessment of this experiment is that reading newspapers and journalism online is vastly inferior to the hard copy thrown on my porch each morning. So I restarted my subscription to the Los Angeles Times and I have made it a point to buy The New York Times as often as I pass one of those coin boxes or my local news stand. The catalyst for this re-evaluation resulted from catching the film, The Soloist on cable last week. I liked the movie, although the scenes I found most interesting were the ones that showed columnist Steve Lopez at work. I realized the book was sitting in my “to-read” stack, so I pulled it and began reading. The book, as I expected, is better than the film. Lopez clearly addresses the revolution occurring in journalism, and worries about his future with the paper even as he researches and writes...
Keep reading

Ideas for fixing unconnected computing

By -
I traveled quite a bit recently and got exposed to a negative aspect of current technology: Things work well if you have a solid internet connection with no traffic limits and are plugged into a power outlet. Otherwise, things do not work well at all. This blog post describes the problems that arise and suggests solutions. Managing data traffic Cell phones are quite good at conserving traffic, laptops much less so. This becomes a problem when your laptop has a mobile connection (e.g., via tethering or in a hotel with data caps). I once accidentally started iTunes in such a situation and immediately used up my daily allowance of traffic. Similarly, mobile email is frugal with traffic (only the current folder is updated, attachments are only downloaded on demand, etc.), desktop email is usually not. How can this be handled better? I’d like to see three traffic modes for all operating systems: “full”, “restricted”, “minimal”: In full traffic mode , all data transfers are allowed and happe...
Keep reading

Omar to kill me

By -
Image
  The sentence “ Omar m’a tuer ” is unintelligible French, as if it had been written by an illiterate person. At first sight, Mme Ghislaine Marchal —the author of those words in blood—seems to be saying that she had been killed by Omar in her villa at Mougins (Alpes-Maritimes). But why would that dying French lady have used such poor grammar? On that flimsy evidence, in 1991, the Moroccan gardener Omar Raddad was condemned and jailed. But he persisted non-stop upon his innocence. In 1998, he was liberated, and now lives in Morocco. A recent analysis of DNA specimens from the scene of the crime provides new facts. Four males, none of whom was Omar Raddad, have left traces of their presence. Will the real murderer be identified at last?
Keep reading