Beyond “always on”

By -
Current technology encourages us to be continuously connected. This blog post predicts that that will change.



Always on



The direction that technology currently takes us could be described as “always on”. The goal is to give us more updates, more quickly. Three recent examples. First, Facebook Home. The website describes the “always on” vision quite well (emphasis is mine):

With Home, everything on your phone gets friendlier. From the moment you turn it on, you see a steady stream of friends’ posts and photos. Upfront notifications and quick access to your essentials mean you’ll never miss a moment. And you can keep chatting with friends, even when you’re using other apps.

Second, Google Glass, where there is always a screen in front of your eyes. Third, existing and rumored smart watches which are also about receiving notifications more directly.

Beyond “always on”



Notifications are a form of stimuli. And, for evolutionary-biological reasons, those are hard to resist for humans. They are mental sugar, if you will. However, we need periods of rest. Thus, my prediction is that health concerns and decreasing interest in social media (et al.) will eventually lead people to look for alternatives.
Historically, communication has (roughly) gone through the following stages:

  • very sporadic and asynchronous (letters)

  • sporadic and synchronous (traditional phones)

  • sporadic and asynchronous (non-mobile email)

  • continuous and synchronous (mobile dumbphones)

  • continuous and asynchronous, with the occasional synchronous communication (mobile smartphones)


The most important technology for giving us freedom from “always on” is (fast) asynchronous communication. As we are moving away from being continuously connected, I expect many innovations in that area. Managing one’s attention is a competitive advantage, which increases the likelihood of good solutions being created – there is money to be made.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Steve Lopez and the Importance of Newspapers

By -
Image
It has been one year since I cancelled my subscriptions to The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times . In that time, I continued to read both publications online. My assessment of this experiment is that reading newspapers and journalism online is vastly inferior to the hard copy thrown on my porch each morning. So I restarted my subscription to the Los Angeles Times and I have made it a point to buy The New York Times as often as I pass one of those coin boxes or my local news stand. The catalyst for this re-evaluation resulted from catching the film, The Soloist on cable last week. I liked the movie, although the scenes I found most interesting were the ones that showed columnist Steve Lopez at work. I realized the book was sitting in my “to-read” stack, so I pulled it and began reading. The book, as I expected, is better than the film. Lopez clearly addresses the revolution occurring in journalism, and worries about his future with the paper even as he researches and writes...
Keep reading

Ideas for fixing unconnected computing

By -
I traveled quite a bit recently and got exposed to a negative aspect of current technology: Things work well if you have a solid internet connection with no traffic limits and are plugged into a power outlet. Otherwise, things do not work well at all. This blog post describes the problems that arise and suggests solutions. Managing data traffic Cell phones are quite good at conserving traffic, laptops much less so. This becomes a problem when your laptop has a mobile connection (e.g., via tethering or in a hotel with data caps). I once accidentally started iTunes in such a situation and immediately used up my daily allowance of traffic. Similarly, mobile email is frugal with traffic (only the current folder is updated, attachments are only downloaded on demand, etc.), desktop email is usually not. How can this be handled better? I’d like to see three traffic modes for all operating systems: “full”, “restricted”, “minimal”: In full traffic mode , all data transfers are allowed and happe...
Keep reading

Omar to kill me

By -
Image
  The sentence “ Omar m’a tuer ” is unintelligible French, as if it had been written by an illiterate person. At first sight, Mme Ghislaine Marchal —the author of those words in blood—seems to be saying that she had been killed by Omar in her villa at Mougins (Alpes-Maritimes). But why would that dying French lady have used such poor grammar? On that flimsy evidence, in 1991, the Moroccan gardener Omar Raddad was condemned and jailed. But he persisted non-stop upon his innocence. In 1998, he was liberated, and now lives in Morocco. A recent analysis of DNA specimens from the scene of the crime provides new facts. Four males, none of whom was Omar Raddad, have left traces of their presence. Will the real murderer be identified at last?
Keep reading